Monday, October 25, 2010
This spate in suicides
Sunday, October 24, 2010
Kanye West's "Runaway"
Friday, October 22, 2010
Thursday, October 21, 2010
Oh, Bruce...
Madea speaks out
An emotional Tyler Perry was on the Oprah Winfrey show yesterday and opened up for the first time on television about being abused and molested three times before he even reached the age of 10. During the hour long segment, he revealed that his father once beat him so bad that he blanked out for a few days.Til this day, I don’t know why he did it. But I remember him cornering me in a room and hitting me with this vacuum cleaner cord. He would just not stop. There are all these welts on [me], the flesh that’s coming from my bone, and I had to wait for him to go to sleep,” Tyler says. “When he fell asleep, I ran to my aunt’s house, and she was mortified when she saw it.
Tyler Perry also revealed that he was 6 the first time he was molested by a neighbor. They were building a birdhouse together when the man put his hands down his pants.“I’m thinking, ‘What is this?’And I felt my body betraying me, because I felt an erection at that age.”
Not too long after that, Tyler was molested by a male nurse that he knew from church.
“[The man from church] used God and the Bible against me to justify a lot of the things that were going on. It was so horrible, and that was my first sexual experience, with this man performing oral sex on me as a boy.”
When Tyler was 10 years old, he was molested again by a friend’s mother. The woman put her son in the bathroom to take a bath and when Tyler was about to leave, she appeared in front of him wearing lingerie. She locked the door and when he tried to leave she said:
“You want to go home? Here’s the key? I come over to get it, and she puts it inside of herself and she tells me to get it. So I—I get the key, but I feel my body betraying me again because I felt an erection. This is so disgusting, you know, what these people did to this little boy.
The woman pulled him on top of her and Tyler had his first sexual experience at the age of 10.
Tyler went on to tell Oprah that the molestations left him confused sexually.
How could it not? I knew I liked the little girls in the neighborhood, but this man was doing something to me and my body kept betraying me. It took me all of my 20s to figure out what this was that this man had given me to carry inside of my heterosexuality that did not belong to me. This is why so many men will not talk about this—the shame of having to admit that.
Til this day, Tyler has to deal with the aftermath of being molested and it has even affected his relationships. He recalls a time that he was unable to perform because a woman locked the door before they became intimate and he had flashbacks of his friend’s mother. Another time, a woman he was in love with walked in wearing lingerie and it triggered the day he was molested again.
“All of these people had given me something to carry,” Tyler says. “I think that everyone who’s been abused, there is a string to the puppet master, and they’re holding you hostage to your behaviors and what you do. At some point, you have to be responsible for them. What I started to do is untie the strings and chase them down to where they came from. And I was able to free myself and understand that even though these things happened to me, it was not me.”
During the show, Tyler admitted that he has forgiven his father but he doesn’t want him to be a part of his life. After his father heard him talk about the abuse, he sent a message to Tyler that said:
“If I had beat your ass one more time, you probably would have been Barack Obama.”
Unreal.
Read more: Tyler Perry Opens Up About Being Molested & Abused On Oprah | Necole Bitchie.com
When (supposed) Metro met (alleged) Hetero



The twirlathon continues....
Saturday, October 16, 2010
Man Seeking Man
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Vintage Eddie Long
So.....
The paradox of HIV infection
Dear Sir,I write with reference to a letter by W. West published October 13, 2010.In it he asks a very poignant question which I have also pondered from the other side of the political fence. That is, given advances in technology, medicine, and economics, why do Men who have Sex with Men (MSM) continue to be disproportionately affected by HIV and AIDS?The human rights approach to advocacy marries increased infection rates to prohibitive laws and non-supportive social environments. In countries such as Jamaica where the gay man is often interpreted in law as essentially an un-apprehended criminal, this pariah status is said to increase vulnerability and risk-taking behaviour. The gay man is typified as a disenfranchised, wandering spirit, flitting from place to place, and bed to bed, in search of the stability that neither church, state, nor family is willing to offer.The panacea as proffered by most socially progressive agents of change is to repeal these prohibitive laws, such as the Buggery Law as it exists in Jamaica.The existence of the law is in itself archaic and repugnant and is a reflection of one of our many societal odes to the dark-ages. The belief is that if such laws are removed then work can begin outside of the veil of secrecy and risk of prosecution, to empower and inevitably save the lives of this vulnerable community. That is a reasonable cause and effect assumption that has caused the ire of the faith-based community which feels entitled to its hatred of sexual minorities and the support of such laws that perpetuate their alienation, demonization, and social exclusion.I am an advocate for the repealing of the buggery law from a public health perspective, but moreso from a human-rights point of view. Just as Lawrence v Texas demonstrated in the USA, buggery/sodomy laws cannot be supported in constitutional law as they unfairly isolate particular citizens and place them in harm's way by virtue of who such laws affect.I feel in this politically correct world, for fear of offending those affected, we have softened the sting in the message that the practice of unsafe anal sex with multiple partners places participants at great risk for HIV infection, and that gay men that engage in such practices are at higher risk of contracting the disease. The problem was that this admission in the early days of the discovery of the disease led to the unfortunate moniker G.R.I.D.S. (Gay Related Immuno Difficiency Syndrome) that politicized the issue and served to reinforce the notion that the disease was divinely inspired as punishment for gay men's hedonistic lifestyles and that their suffering and death was just recompense to a displeased god. This prejudice has apparently influenced the medical response to this issue among gay men in Jamaica. At present, there are very few places that can and do offer a safe space and medical care for MSMs and as a result many are walking around oblivious to the danger coursing through their veins.The reality, in my mind, is that we must mature as a people to be able to separate the political football that is "homosexuality" from the fact that there is a ticking time-bomb that is being pushed further and further under the carpet on which we are all standing. That is, the rate of infection among Jamaica's MSM and what is being done to address it.I refuse to adopt the cynical perspective one can infer from W. West's letter, past ones included, that creates the impression that gay men are infectious disease vectors that are hell-bent on self-destruction. I believe that curbing the spread of the disease is a two-way street with the state recognizing and protecting sexual minorities' rights to exist freely in society and have unbiased access to medical care, and also the sexual minority groups taking responsibility for themselves and the risk they place themselves in by being sexually irresponsible.In this instance I believe we must look within, at our own unique variables, and not necessarily to the outside for answers. Each country that is grappling with the paradox of increased infections in the midst of increased prosperity has underlying factors that need to be explored in order to come to a better understanding, while not demonizing those who become infected.I am sincerely,Brian-Paul Welsh
Monday, October 11, 2010
Yup, I'm just about to sign out of life...
Friday, October 08, 2010
Weeping for my brothers and sisters.
Thursday, October 07, 2010
"Show me your friends and I'll tell you who you are..."

Wednesday, October 06, 2010
Dead men tell no tales. Or do they?
Tuesday, October 05, 2010
Oh ye of little shame


Saturday, October 02, 2010
You can't tell me nothing.....


Sonic Revelations


Religious musings...
Dear Sir,
Patrick Gallimore's rambling diatribe (published September 27, 2010) in defense of Devon Dick's religious arrogance is symptomatic of a flawed belief system that actively discourages critical thought from its followers and instead proselytizes a religion of rote, fear and blind obedience.
That is the only conclusion one can draw from the circular arguments he presented with the hopes of getting atheists to see the light.
There is no light in his convictions, only the darkness of fearful servitude to the malevolent boogey man as invented by the architects of Christianity.
I don't need to be a slave to the Christian doctrine to have the spiritual cognizance to know that this world and all its inhabitants have a greater purpose as watched over by an invisible hand with greater knowledge than our own.
I refuse to disregard the millenia of wisdom gained by ancient cultures in favour of a zionist, big-stick religion of xenophobia. There is much greater truth than exists in the Bible and much greater love and acceptance than the present Christian manifestation will tolerate.
It is insulting to my God-given intelligence for Gallimore, and others that share his beliefs, to expect a grown man with a functioning brain to buy the "take it on faith" argument. That is an answer you give to children when you want them to stop annoying you with questions you don't know how to answer. There's nothing wrong with saying "I don't know" but the Christian notion that their system is the final authority precludes them from this sort of humility.
None of us knows all the answers but I'd rather hold my most cherished personal convictions with even a small amount of doubt lest I am wrong, which I always maintain as a possibility.
To do otherwise would be silly and an insult to the intelligence that we are all blessed with.I am etc,Brian-Paul N. Welsh




